Whenever I see gun control articles popping up from the pages of newspapers and journals, the question that arises in my mind is whether we need one more gun control essay. What is the purpose of writing a gun control essay? Unless it is an essay written by a student as an assignment, the purpose of any gun control article is to list out the gun control pros and cons and analyze the question of stricter gun control from different perspectives.
Many a gun control essay has been written during the last many years. The gun control debate has been carried on both in structured and unstructured ways in public forums, newspaper pages and innumerable formal and informal groups. Whether it is a gun control essay or a debate, it can only highlight the issues for and against unrestricted gun ownership. The essay has to invariably present gun control facts to drive home the message it is seeking to convey. Some of the gun crime statistics revealed in one gun control essay or other are as below.
1) The United States has a disproportionate share of the total number of guns available in the world. It owns about 50 percent of them though it holds only 5 percent of the population of the world.
2) Another item of gun death statistics a gun control essay has mentioned is that 60 percent of the homicides in the US are caused by guns.
3) While listing the above two facts, one gun control essay has also brought out the link between gun ownership and gun crime and pointed out how this fact was contrary to the claim made by the pro gun lobbies that having more guns would have the effect of reducing the crime. People who make this claim have not been able to cite any evidence supporting it.
4) In addition to presenting the arguments made by both the sides, another gun control essay also examined the merit of the points. The essay countered the argument of the anti gun control groups that gun rights are guaranteed by the 2nd amendment by pointing out that 99 percent of this law was created by people with no background in law. This gun control essay also exposed the role of the pro NRA (National Rifles Association) legislators in blocking the CDC from studying gun violence by making rules that will make its task difficult.
If you are an open minded person, you will be interested in studying gun control pros and cons, before making up your mind about extending support to gun control measures. The factors supporting gun control far outweigh those that are not, both in terms of numbers and in terms of weight. Let us start with gun crime statistics. Looking at gun death statistics is essential for understanding the gun control pros and cons.
I came across these gun control facts in a gun control article on gun control pros and cons I read recently. These figures are based on studies made by various independent organizations and government agencies. We will start with the figures of gun ownership. If you know the population of the United States, you can take it as a close approximation of the number of guns owned by the American people since studies show that there are 89 guns for 100 Americans!
Whether some people like it or not, a list of gun control pros and cons will reveal that factors favoring stronger gun control laws dominate the list. Another data I gathered from a different gun control essay is that as many as 30,000 American people die every year in gun crimes. This is shocking enough. But you will be shell shocked to know that the ratio of gun deaths in a country to the population of the country is higher for the US than for South Africa. Thus the US is ranked worse than South Africa in terms of safety from gun crime.
Gun control pros and cons are not made of figures alone. They also include concrete facts like the decrease in gun crime seen in Australia after the Australian government implemented strict gun control measures. This is a positive evidence in favor of enacting a more stringent law to control the use of guns. This fact supports another finding that strict gun laws have a positive effect on suicides also, apart from bringing down gun deaths.
We should consider gun control pros and cons to judge the issue of gun control dispassionately. But there are some groups which are not inclined to involve themselves in such an exercise. Apparently, they have a fear that gun control facts may not favor them. But people who are in favor of strong gun control measures are willing to consider gun control pros and cons. They can afford to do this because the gun crime statistics are in their favor!
When we start looking at the gun control pros and cons, we need to necessarily look at gun death statistics. Gun death being a major issue propelling the gun control movement, we need to necessarily look at the information provided by innumerable gun control articles published in the media over the past few decades. Since a gun control article may be in favor of or against strong gun control legislation, depending on the position of the author of the article, we will find both gun control pros and cons listed, if we read a large number of articles. Reading a number of articles will thus make our analysis more balanced.
Gun control pros and cons include information on gun crime. Gun crime statistics show that the US has the largest gun ownership ratio with 89 guns per 100 people. When we consider this along with another fact that the US has a larger ratio of the number of gun deaths to population than South Africa, we cannot fail to see a link between bun ownership and gun crime. After all, study of gun pros and cons has the objective of drawing the right conclusions from such a study.
But there are some sections of the population like the National Rifles Association (NRA) who are interested not in looking at the pros ad cons of gun control but only in pursuing their agenda of anti gun control. Such a stand by the NRA shows it to be a highly paid lobby, not as an association of sports persons, as it will want us to believe. Unfortunately, there are some pro NRA legislators who, without considering the gun control pros and cons, persist in aiding the cause of the NRA by making rules preventing the National Institute of Health even from studying gun violence.
Gun crime statistics are compiled for a reason. The purpose of statistics, in general, is to present data in a simplified and useful way so that the people concerned can use the data to analyze the situation and take adequate steps to improve things. But gun death statistics do not seem to have been taken seriously by the law makers. On the other hand, gun control pros and cons are being discussed endlessly with no breakthrough being achieved.
The following are the highlights of the situation presented by gun crime statistics:
1) A very high proportion of homicides involve use of guns. According to a finding, the figure is 60 percent , well past the half way mark. This is not something that the advocates of uncontrolled gun ownership can derive comfort from. The high gun death percentage in homicides should lead to an honest introspection by all concerned.
2) The number of deaths resulting from gunshots is about 30,000. This high figure should awaken the conscience of the gun lobby and make it agree for at least some compromise. This is the message conveyed by this part of the gun crime statistics. If you consider this figure along with the fact that women and children are more vulnerable to gun death in houses that have guns, you can realize the danger potential of guns.
3) Gun control facts may not move the NRA who are bent upon blocking any gun control measure and who are not interested in joining any meaningful gun control debate either. If you think that the NRA is a gun club, you may have to change your perception. NRA is a highly paid lobby with the sole objective of blocking all gun control measures using any means it is capable of. Gun crime statistics will cut no ice with it.
4) Even as we are discussing gun crime statistics, we should be alert to the fact that there are many legislators who stand by NRA and who make it a point to block all CDC efforts at collecting gun death statistics, going to the extent of stopping them on their tracks when they attempt to study gun violence.
This is where you need to be to find unbiased gun crime statistics. There are a bunch of bad data floating around, read real gun crime data and form your opinions from real statistics.