It appears that everyone wants to write a gun control article. We all know that the issue of gun control has been getting increased attention day by day due to claims and counter claims by both the sides. Writing a gun control article is one way of joining the gun control debate by sharing one’s views before the public at large. After all, periodicals are interested in publishing gun control articles that will discuss the gun control pros and cons in detail with a view to making their readers make well informed on the topic.
What are the points one can include in a gun control article? One set of data that has to be included is gun crime statistics. The article can list the gun control facts that are available in the public domain and discuss the significance of these figures. For example, gun death statistics indicate that the average number of people who are killed every year in our county is 30,000. If the gun control article presents this figure along with another, relating to gun ownership and explain how these two figures are related, readers will have a correct perspective of the situation. The gun ownership figures for different countries reveal that the United States has a disproportionately high rate of gun ownership in that with a population that forms just 5 percent of the population of the world, the US owns about 50 percent of the guns available in the world! When a reader considers these two sets of facts presented by the gun control article together, he will be able to understand that high gun ownership is likely to lead a high crime rate.
The gun control article can also add another piece of information that in homes that have guns, women and children are exposed to an increased risk of gun death. Apart from discussing data relating to gun crime, the gun control article should also deal with those who stubbornly oppose any kind of gun control. The NRA (National Rifles Association), the leading opponent of gun control legislation, has been following a policy of no compromise on its stubborn stand. The gun control article should use this fact to question the claim of the NRA to be an association and expose its real role as a lobbying body.
Gun death statistics abound. You can see them in the papers and hear them in television news, debates etc. These statistics should not be thought of as just some figures. Gun death statistics are records of how many human lives are lost due to gun violence. If we learn to look at gun crime statistics as the price we are paying for our inability or willingness to curb the use of guns through strong gun control laws, we will definitely be disturbed by the picture they present.
Let us pick a few facts from gun death statistics. Which are the places more prone to gun violence? The answer provided by gun control facts may surprise you. Gun death statistics reveal that in those regions where a greater percentage of the population owns guns, a greater percentage of women and children become victims of gun violence. Not only that, in homes that have guns, the chances of women and children shot dead by guns are high. So, what is the message delivered by gun death statistics? Where there is a gun, there is death! It is as simple as that. The facts are too strong to be ignored or dismissed by anyone.
Another information provided by gun death statistics is through comparison. If we compute the number of gun deaths for a population of 100,000, the United States is ranked worse than South Africa. This point should be brought out in the gun control debate so that Americans will know to what extent gun crime is prevalent in their country.
Unfortunately, not all Americans are sensitive to gun death statistics. There are organizations like the NRA (National Rifles Association) that have been taking up the cudgels for uncontrolled gun ownership. The NRA has been forcing some legislators to back up its cause by threatening them with defeat in the primaries, if they won’t toe its line. This threat seems to have had some effect because we find that some legislators are obstructing even compilation of gun death statistics by making rules that will obstruct organizations like the CDC from even studying gun violence.
A gun control article may not be read by all. Not all people are interested in the topic of gun control. But, gun crime affects everyone. Therefore every one should be interested in knowing gun control facts. Reading a gun control article is one way of understanding the issues involved, even though one may not be interested in joining the gun control debate.
A gun control article is expected to list the gun control pros and cons and analyze them dispassionately. People read articles to get a better perspective of the issues. So, a well written gun control article should fulfill their needs. Gun control articles will invariably present gun crime statistics. These articles may also connect different items of statistics by pointing out the common thread running through them.
For example, gun death statistics reveal that more children are killed by guns in those places that have many people possessing guns. There is another data which states that in houses that have guns, the chances of women and children getting caught in gun violence are high. A gun control article may present these two sets of statistics together and bring out the message that can be read from them to the effect that gun ownership increases the risk for the family members of the gun owners.
In addition to this negative data, the gun control article may also cite the information that countries that have tightened their laws have found that gun laws bring down not only murders but also suicides. Thus the article can put the gun control issue in perspective by showing the positive results of gun control and the negative consequences of uncontrolled gun ownership.
A good gun control article should also bring out the fallacies in some of the irrational arguments. People who fight gun control measures take shelter under the 2nd amendment claiming the right to own guns as an absolute right guaranteed by this law. The article can counter this fallacious argument by revealing the fact that about 99 percent of the information for this amendment was provided by people with no background in legal education.
Lastly, a gun control article should also discuss the economic aspects of gun control. Many people may not be aware that gun violence leads to an economic loss of about 3.7 dollars peer year to the US.
Whenever I see gun control articles popping up from the pages of newspapers and journals, the question that arises in my mind is whether we need one more gun control essay. What is the purpose of writing a gun control essay? Unless it is an essay written by a student as an assignment, the purpose of any gun control article is to list out the gun control pros and cons and analyze the question of stricter gun control from different perspectives.
Many a gun control essay has been written during the last many years. The gun control debate has been carried on both in structured and unstructured ways in public forums, newspaper pages and innumerable formal and informal groups. Whether it is a gun control essay or a debate, it can only highlight the issues for and against unrestricted gun ownership. The essay has to invariably present gun control facts to drive home the message it is seeking to convey. Some of the gun crime statistics revealed in one gun control essay or other are as below.
1) The United States has a disproportionate share of the total number of guns available in the world. It owns about 50 percent of them though it holds only 5 percent of the population of the world.
2) Another item of gun death statistics a gun control essay has mentioned is that 60 percent of the homicides in the US are caused by guns.
3) While listing the above two facts, one gun control essay has also brought out the link between gun ownership and gun crime and pointed out how this fact was contrary to the claim made by the pro gun lobbies that having more guns would have the effect of reducing the crime. People who make this claim have not been able to cite any evidence supporting it.
4) In addition to presenting the arguments made by both the sides, another gun control essay also examined the merit of the points. The essay countered the argument of the anti gun control groups that gun rights are guaranteed by the 2nd amendment by pointing out that 99 percent of this law was created by people with no background in law. This gun control essay also exposed the role of the pro NRA (National Rifles Association) legislators in blocking the CDC from studying gun violence by making rules that will make its task difficult.
Gun control pros and cons do not matter for some people. These people are just not interested in any gun control debate that will bring out the gun control pros and cons. They just want their way, whatever gun control facts may point out.
Discussing gun control pros and cons will serve any useful purpose only if both sides to the issue of gun control are willing to consider the facts objectively and accept the reality presented by them. Let us consider the fact that people in the United States have about 50 percent of all the privately owned guns in the world. What is wrong with this, the pro gun people may ask. But if we point out to them that the US has only 5 percent of the population of the world, they will have no answer. So instead of countering the issues projected by gun crime statistics, these people will raise extraneous points that will have no bearing on the issue.
For example, one of the arguments made by the anti gun control lobby is that the right to own guns is a right given to us by the second amendment and that this right cannot be taken away by any other law. Apart from the fact that this argument has no relevance to gun control pros and cons, there is also the fact that this amendment was created for its most part by people with no legal education.
Unfortunately fot those opposing gun control, the gun control pros and cons are weighed heavily in favor of tighter gun control. Gun death statistics reveal that Australia was able to reduce gun violence by 60 percent after it brought in a strict gun control regime. What applies to Australia should apply to the US also. Gun crime statistics from various countries show that in palces where gun control laws were made stiffer, the number of murders as well as that of suicides was brought down.
With gun control pros and cons not being in their favor, the anti gun control lobby led by the National Rifles Association (NRA) has started using other methods. Legislators owing allegiance to the NRA are making rules that will make it difficult for the CDC to study gun violence. This kind of unfair practices on the paet of these people are a clear pointer to what picture do the gun control pros and cons present.
I read a gun control article which presented gun control facts so impressively that it appeared to have settled the gun control debate in favor of a strong gun control regime. A single article has done what a large number of other gun control articles have not been able to do. The success of this gun control essay stemmed from its approach.
Normally, a gun control article will discuss the gun control pros and cons extensively making the reader mentally fatigued. But this control made the issue more interesting by using a right mix of gun crime statistics and arguments presented by both sides. Instead of confusing the reader with a plethora of statistical information, this gun control article focused on just a few gun death statistics that were powerful enough to deliver a strong message.
In fact, just two of the gun death statistics I found in this article should be sufficient to bolster the case for a strong gun control regime. One is about the extent of gun ownership in the US. This gun control article brought out the stunning data that there are 89 guns for 100 Americans. It left the consequences of this high level of gun ownership to the imagination of its readers. The second fact mentioned by this gun control article was how gun crime affected the US economy by causing a loss of $3.70 million every year.
This gun control article then went on to examine the attitude and actions of the pro gun control lobby led by the high profile National Rifles Association (NRA). The article questioned the fairness of the policy of the NRA never to compromise on its opposition to gun laws. The article also highlighted the fact that the pro gun groups chose to resort to unethical actions rather than present facts supporting their case. The gun control article highlighted the action of the pro NRA legislators who did everything in their power to stymie the efforts of the CDC to study gun violence by making laws that will cause obstructions to the CDC. This gun control article thus did an admirable job in furthering the cause of gun control.
If I am asked to write a gun control essay, how will I like to structure it? My gun control essay will definitely highlight gun control facts. It will also examine the gun control pros and cons made out by people on either side of the gun control debate.
There will be no difficulty in collecting gun crime statistics. Various government agencies as well as independent bodies including the United Nations Organization (UNO) have made extensive studies of gun crime and compiled a wide array of gun death statistics. Picking out a few relevant facts and presenting them will give credibility to my gun control essay. Here are some gun control facts I would like to include in my gun control essay are
Is the claim made by the antagonists of gun control that guns are needed to protect themselves and their family members borne out by facts? No. In fact, gun death statistics show the opposite to be true. Studies have shown that about 39 percent of the children of people having guns are aware of the places the guns are kept in their houses. So, what can stop these children from taking the guns in their hands and using them inappropriately? This danger is more severe than a possible attack by some criminals. Another fact I would like to present in my gun control essay is that in countries hat have enacted strong gun control laws, it has been found that strict gun laws have reduced not only murders but also suicides.
By way of evaluating the gun control pros and cons, I would like my gun control essay to focus on the role played by the pro gun groups like the National Rifles Association (NRA). My essay will expose the fact that the NRA has been following a policy of not compromising its rigid position on gun control. Hence it will be more appropriate to describe the NRA as a lobbyist body rather than a political organization. The NRA has the support of some legislators who go to the extent of putting obstacles in the way of the CDC in its efforts to study gun violence by making laws that will make its job difficult. My gun control essay will thus make out a strong case for gun control both by using gun crime statistics and by highlighting the unfair actions of the anti gun control groups.
What can one gun control article do? An endless number of gun control articles have been rolling out of the presses and finding places in popular magazines and other periodicals. Many of them have discussed the gun control pros and cons exhaustively leaving the readers in no doubt about which side they should take in the gun control debate. But we do not see anything significant happening by way of making the gun control laws stronger.
In such a scenario, is there a scope for one more gun control article and if there is, what should it focus on? I strongly believe that one gun control article can make a difference to the gun control scene. The article should focus on just one thing. It should collect gun control facts and present them in a way the readers will be able to appreciate their significance. Reproducing gun crime statistics may not create any interest in readers who are being flooded with gun death statistics almost on a daily basis.
The first thing the gun control article should highlight is the unusually large gun density in the United States. By gun density, I mean the number of guns relative to the number of people living in this country. A statistical data like a figure of 89 guns for 100 Americans may be lost among many readers. It is the duty of the gun control article to point out that this means that there is an average of nearly one gun for each American! Such a depiction will highlight the abnormality of gun ownership in the US. The gun control article should also bring in some unusual statistical information like revealing that gun crime has a toll even on the economy of the US, by causing a loss of 3.7 billion dollars per annum.
In addition to discussing facts relating to gun crime, the gun control article should also dwell on the approach of the anti gun control bodies like the National Rifles Association (NRA). The article should make the readers understand that the NRA has been functioning not like an association of sportsmen but as a lobby. This assertion can be supported by disclosing the threats being made by the NRA to legislators that they would face defeat in the primaries if they fail to endorse the stand of the NRA. A gun control article focusing on these aspects can make a difference.
A gun control essay that I came across contained some information which was new to me. Some of the gun control facts mentioned in the essay was so shocking that I had a doubt whether this gun control essay was trying to mislead us by giving some gun crime statistics which might not be true. It was only after I had found the same gun death statistics in other gun control articles also that I was convinced that this gun control essay was not misleading people but was just telling the truth. I give below the list of gun control facts which I found unbelievable at first but which proved to be correct on my checking them with authentic sources.
1) The gun control essay said that about 40 percent of children staying in houses where guns were kept knew exactly where their parents had kept them. This data shocked me when I thought about the consequence of this. It was this possibility that created the disbelief in the beginning. But unfortunately, this information is true and there is a real risk of some guns falling into the hands of kids.
2) This gun control essay also quoted the results of a study which found that there was no evidence to prove the claim that having more guns would result in less crime since people who own guns could protect themselves from attacks.
3) Another fact highlighted by this gun control essay was that countries which had a relatively smaller number of guns also recorded a smaller number of crimes. This information shows that though many weapons can be used to commit murders, guns seem to be the predominant weapon used in murders. So, the more guns are available in a place, the greater are the chances for murders to take place. This fact suggests that the logical route to check crimes is to make availability of guns difficult.
4) This gun control essay also examined the stand taken by the National Rifles Association (NRA) and came out with the conclusion that far from being an association of sports people, the NRA should be considered an anti gun control lobby.
If you are an open minded person, you will be interested in studying gun control pros and cons, before making up your mind about extending support to gun control measures. The factors supporting gun control far outweigh those that are not, both in terms of numbers and in terms of weight. Let us start with gun crime statistics. Looking at gun death statistics is essential for understanding the gun control pros and cons.
I came across these gun control facts in a gun control article on gun control pros and cons I read recently. These figures are based on studies made by various independent organizations and government agencies. We will start with the figures of gun ownership. If you know the population of the United States, you can take it as a close approximation of the number of guns owned by the American people since studies show that there are 89 guns for 100 Americans!
Whether some people like it or not, a list of gun control pros and cons will reveal that factors favoring stronger gun control laws dominate the list. Another data I gathered from a different gun control essay is that as many as 30,000 American people die every year in gun crimes. This is shocking enough. But you will be shell shocked to know that the ratio of gun deaths in a country to the population of the country is higher for the US than for South Africa. Thus the US is ranked worse than South Africa in terms of safety from gun crime.
Gun control pros and cons are not made of figures alone. They also include concrete facts like the decrease in gun crime seen in Australia after the Australian government implemented strict gun control measures. This is a positive evidence in favor of enacting a more stringent law to control the use of guns. This fact supports another finding that strict gun laws have a positive effect on suicides also, apart from bringing down gun deaths.